Main Second Level Navigation
- Welcome
- Why Toronto?
- History of the Department
- Vision & Strategic Priorities
- Our Leadership
- Faculty Directory
- Our Support Staff
- Location & Contact
- Departmental Committees
- Department of Medicine Prizes & Awards
- Department of Medicine Resident Awards
- Department of Medicine: Self-Study Report (2013 - 2018)
- Department of Medicine: Self-Study Report (2018 - 2023)
- Communication Resources
- News
- Events
Breadcrumbs
Department of Medicine Prizes & Awards
Each year, the Department of Medicine honours faculty members who have made significant and meaningful contributions to education, teaching, research, quality and innovation, humanism, mentorship and clinical practice. These prizes and awards celebrate our faculty members and recognize the local and global impact of the Department of Medicine.
Nomination packages, including the nomination checklist, should be submitted in a single PDF file by April 1, 2025 to dom.awards@utoronto.ca.
Nomination packages are reviewed and ranked by the Dept. of Medicine portfolio overseeing each award.
These prizes and awards are presented at the Department of Medicine’s Annual Day each year.
Education and Teaching Awards
Department of Medicine Teacher of the Year Award
The Department of Medicine Teacher of the Year Award (established in 1989) is the highest recognition for teaching and educational excellence. This award honours a member of the Department of Medicine who has demonstrated significant commitment and exceptional contributions to teaching throughout their career, and has more than 20 years of teaching experience as a full-time faculty member. The award consists of a commemorative certificate.
Nominations should address the following key criteria:
- Commitment to Teaching Excellence: Evidence of a strong dedication to teaching and a track record of outstanding performance with diverse groups of learners in a variety of settings.
- Subject Mastery: Demonstrate deep understanding and expertise in the subject matter.
- Engagement and Inspiration: Proven ability to stimulate and engage learners through creativity, innovation, enthusiasm, and effective teaching styles.
- Effective Instructional Practices: Use of appropriate teaching resources and methodologies that enhance learning outcomes and cater to diverse learner needs.
- Commitment to Professional Development and Academic Community: Active participation in ongoing professional development focused on teaching and learning, along with collaboration with colleagues to strengthen the department's overall teaching culture.
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
- A nomination letter with the signature of the nominator(s)
- A joint letter of support from division director (DDD) and physician-in-chief (PIC)
- Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination and should not be longer than three pages. Letters that are the most helpful address the criteria of the award and present evidence supporting the nominee’s excellence in this criterion.
- A current CV of the nominee
- Self nominations are ineligible
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
- Nominator will also inform the DDD and/or PIC of the intent to submit a nomination.
Department of Medicine Mid-Career Teaching Award
The Mid-Career Teaching Award (inaugurated in 2024) is for mid-career faculty members within the Department of Medicine. The award consists of a commemorative certificate.
Criteria: This award recognizes a member of the Department of Medicine who is within 11-20 years of appointment to the department and has made contributions of notable merit to the advancement of sound knowledge in medicine through teaching and education.
Nominations should address the following key criteria:
-
Commitment to Teaching Excellence: Evidence of a strong dedication to teaching and a track record of outstanding performance with diverse groups of learners in a variety of settings.
-
Subject Mastery: Demonstrate deep understanding and expertise in the subject matter.
-
Engagement and Inspiration: Proven ability to stimulate and engage learners through creativity, innovation, enthusiasm, and effective teaching styles.
-
Effective Instructional Practices: Use of appropriate teaching resources and methodologies that enhance learning outcomes and cater to diverse learner needs.
-
Commitment to Professional Development and Academic Community: Active participation in ongoing professional development focused on teaching and learning, along with collaboration with colleagues to strengthen the department's overall teaching culture.
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
-
A nomination letter with the signature of the nominator(s)
-
Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination and should not be longer than three pages. Letters that are the most helpful address the criteria of the award and present evidence supporting the nominee’s excellence in this criterion.
-
A current CV of the nominee
-
Self nominations are ineligible
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
-
Nominator will also inform the DDD and/or PIC of the intent to submit the nomination. The purpose of informing DDD and PIC is for their situational awareness and not to screen the nominees. PICs and DDDs have unique insights which may help strengthen the nomination package.
Culture and Inclusion Awards
Robert Hyland Award for Excellence in Mentorship (Late Career)
This award was introduced in 2007 and re-named the Robert Hyland Award for Excellence in Mentorship in 2010. The award consists of a commemorative certificate.
Criteria: This award recognizes a Deptartment of Medicine Late career faculty member (20+ years of appointment to the department) who has shown sustained excellence* (as a mentor) in mentoring other faculty members within the Department of Medicine.
Nominations should address the following key criteria for *Sustained excellence in effective mentorship (including but not limited to):
- assisting faculty members to develop their professional careers while balancing the competing demands of their personal lives
- guiding them in navigating the university culture
- fostering self-reflection skills
- offering networking and sponsorship opportunities when needed
An effective mentor exemplifies altruism, models professionalism, delivers constructive feedback (when needed), makes time for mentees, and significantly influences the career development of their mentees.
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
- A single nomination letter with the signature(s) of the nominator(s)*
- Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination and should not be longer than three pages and emphasize specific examples of the mentor’s impact as experienced or directly observed by the nominator.
- A current CV of the nominee
- List of all the mentees
- Self nominations are ineligible
*Multiple nominators can sign the nomination letter.
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
- The nominator will also inform the DDD and/or PIC of their intent to submit a nomination package. Both the DDD and PIC may offer valuable insights that could enhance the strength and quality of the nomination.
Robert Hyland Award for Excellence in Mentorship (Mid-Career)
Criteria: Starting in 2024, this award recognizes a Department of Medicine mid-career faculty member (11-20 years of appointment within the department) who has shown sustained excellence* (as a mentor) in mentoring other faculty members within the Department of Medicine.
*Sustained excellence in effective mentorship includes (but not limited to):
-
assisting faculty members to develop their professional careers while balancing the competing demands of their personal lives
-
guiding them in navigating the university culture
-
fostering self-reflection skills
-
offering networking and sponsorship opportunities when needed
An effective mentor exemplifies altruism, models professionalism, delivers constructive feedback (when needed), makes time for mentees, and significantly influences career development of their mentees.
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
-
A nomination letter with the signature(s) of the nominator(s)
-
Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination and should not be longer than three pages. Letters that are the most helpful address the criteria of the award and present evidence supporting the nominee’s excellence in this criterion.
-
A current CV of the nominee
-
List of all the mentees (past and current including both within and without Dept. of Medicine)
-
Self nominations are ineligible
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
-
The nominator will also inform the DDD and/or PIC of their intent to submit a nomination package. Both the DDD and PIC may offer valuable insights that could enhance the strength and quality of the nomination.
Department of Medicine Academy of Master Clinicians
The Department of Medicine overriding mission is to ensure the delivery of excellent clinical care in its associated hospitals, and the preparation of future physician leaders to carry this mission forward throughout Canada and beyond. Within the department, certain faculty members serve as exemplars of this mission, providing leadership in patient care that elevates and enlarges the profession.
Criteria: The Academy of Master Clinicians honours the Deptartment of Medicine faculty members who:
-
Demonstrate consistent outstanding clinical performance
-
Deliver the highest standard of patient care
-
Set an example in high quality patient care and diagnostic acumen
-
Are able to confront challenging cases, while demonstrating humility, respect and civility for patients and colleagues
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
-
A nomination letter with the signature of the nominator(s)
-
A joint letter of support from Department Division Director (DDD) and Physician-in-Chief (PIC)
-
Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination and should not be longer than three pages. Letters that are the most helpful address the criteria of the award and present evidence supporting the nominee’s excellence in this criterion.
-
A current CV of the nominee
-
Self nominations are ineligible
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
Michael Gordon Award for Humanism in Medicine
The Department of Medicine’s top priority is to ensure patients, their families and their experiences in healthcare settings drive our work. The Humanism in Medicine Award was established in 2018 to indicate the department's commitment to the principle of person-centered care. In 2019, the award was renamed the Michael Gordon Award for Humanism in Medicine to recognize Dr. Gordon’s exceptional leadership in bridging physician and family roles in the development of best care practices for patients, and the profound impact he has had on how medicine is practiced.
Criteria:
This award aims to recognize a Department of Medicine faculty member who:
-
Exemplifies a deep and abiding commitment to humanism* in health care
-
Models the fundamental principles of "person-centeredness" with open communication, mutual respect, empathy and understanding between physicians and their patients
*Humanism is understood to be an acknowledgment of other human beings as individuals with autonomy, unique backgrounds, values and perspectives, and a commitment to acknowledging cultural differences and addressing issues of inclusion, equity, and social justice.
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
-
A nomination letter with the signature of the nominator(s)
-
A joint letter of support from Department Division Director (DDD) and Physician-in-Chief (PIC)
-
Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination and should not be longer than three pages. Letters that are the most helpful address the criteria of the award and present evidence supporting the nominee’s excellence in this criterion.
-
A current CV of the nominee
-
Self nominations are ineligible
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
Quality & Innovation Awards
Department of Medicine Award in Quality and Innovation
The Department of Medicine started to recognize contributions in the field of healthcare quality, patient safety, and innovation in 2007.
Criteria: The award recognizes Department of Medicine faculty members appointed for more than 10 years within the department, with outstanding leadership or academic contributions that aim to improve the quality of healthcare.
Examples might include:
-
efforts to improve the degree to which patients receive proven aspects of care (e.g. increasing guideline concordant care)
-
reducing harm to patients from medical care (patient safety)
-
innovations in health services delivery - new models of care that improve outcomes, the patient experience, or healthcare value
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
-
A nomination letter with the signature(s) of the nominator(s)*
-
Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination and be maximum 3-pages in length. Letters that are the most helpful address the criteria of the award and present evidence supporting the nominee’s excellence in this criterion.
-
A current CV of the nominee
-
Self nominations are ineligible
*Multiple nominators can sign a single nomination letter.
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
-
The nominator will also inform the DDD and/or PIC of their intent to submit a nomination package. Both the DDD and PIC may offer valuable insights that could enhance the strength and quality of the nomination.
Research Awards
The William Goldie Prize and Travel Awards
The William Goldie Prize and Travel Award was established in 1945 by an anonymous donour to honour the late Dr. William Goldie, who held a faculty appointment in the Department of Medicine. The prize consists of a commemorative certificate and a travel grant.
Criteria: The prize is awarded annually to members of the Department of Medicine who:
- are within the first 10 years of appointment to the department
- have made contributions of notable merit to the advancement of sound knowledge* through research, teaching, education or quality & innovation.
* The concept of "advancing sound knowledge" takes a holistic view, recognizing that the true impact of intellectual contributions may extend beyond academic circles.
Four prizes are awarded each year:
- one for research contributions
- one for teaching contributions
- one for contributions in education scholarship and innovation
- one for quality & innovation contributions
Nomination Process:
Nominations can be submitted by any member of the Department of Medicine. Nomination package should include:
- A nomination letter with the signature of the nominator(s)
- Nomination letter should summarize the reasons for the nomination. Letters that are the most helpful address the criteria of the award and present evidence supporting the nominee’s excellence in this criterion.
- A current CV of the nominee
- Self nominations are ineligible
The nominator is responsible for the collection and submission of the award nomination package and informing the nominee of their nominations.
- Nominator will also inform the DDD and/or PIC of the intent to submit a nomination. The purpose of informing DDD and PIC is for their situational awareness and not to screen the nominees. PICs and DDDs have unique insights which may help strengthen the nomination package.
Past Award Recipients
Department of Medicine Academy of Master Clinicians2024 Robert Fowler 2023 Paula Harvey 2022 Kris Nair 2021 Louise Perlin 2020 Michelle Hladunewich 2019 David Tang-Wai
|
Eaton Scholar Researcher of the Year2024 David Cherney 2023 Jordan Feld 2022 Allison McGeer (Honorary) 2020 Mansoor Husain (Basic Science) |
Department of Medicine Teacher of the Year2024 Katina Tzanetos 2023 Edward Etchells 2022 Yuna Lee 2020 David Tang-Wai |
Robert Hyland Award for Excellence in Mentorship2024 Shiphra Ginsburg 2023 Rodrigo Calvacanti 2022 Sharon Walmsley 2020 Srikala Sridhar |
Department of Medicine Award in Quality and Innovation2024 Andrea Furlan 2023 Samir Gupta 2022 Andrew Morris 2020 Peter Rossos |
Department of Medicine Award for Humanism in Medicine2024 Stephen Hwang 2023 Shail Rawal 2022 James Maskalyk 2020 Sivakumar Gulasingam & Liesly Lee |
The William Goldie Prize and Travel Award in Education2024 Nisha Andany 2023 Lindsay Melvin 2022 Umberin Najeeb 2020 Esther Bui |
The William Goldie Prize and Travel Award in Research2024 Sharmistha Mishra (Clinical) 2023 Fahad Razak (Clinical) 2022 Dinesh Thavendiranathan 2020 Harindra Wijeysundera |
The William Goldie Prize and Travel Award in Quality & Innovation2024 Thomas MacMillan 2023 Lucas Chartier 2022 Amanda Mayo 2020 Geetha Mukerji & Samir Sinha |
The William Goldie Prize and Travel Award in Teaching2024 Yayi Huang 2023 Aaron Izenberg 2022 Dharini Mahendira 2020 David Frost |
Department of Medicine Mid-Career Teaching Award2024 David Frost |
Michael Farkouh Network Leadership Award2024 Nick Daneman |